Subject	If they had some how contrasted the taillights instead
Posted by	jzack on September 12, 2008 at 7:40 PM
	This message has been viewed 40 times.
In Reply To	BTW.. it is on Ebay right now too. The back is a bit ugly.. (n/m) posted by XTZ on September 12, 2008 at 12:14 AM
Message	painting it all the same as the body color that would have helped too. Lot of body work went into that car -- I like the front and side parts of it. Maybe they should have gone with another color too?
Follow Ups	Interesting looking 300zx - XTZ 00:13:20 09/12/08 BTW.. it is on Ebay right now too. The back is a bit ugly.. (n/m) - XTZ 00:14:52 09/12/08 If they had some how contrasted the taillights instead - jzack 19:40:51 09/12/08 phail.. (n/m) - z-spott[HI] 00:16:35 09/12/08 ... because needing to service your shocks is over rated? (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 00:17:04 09/12/08 what the hell happened to the hatch (n/m) - Pilot.P (NZ) 00:17:14 09/12/08 Re: what the hell happened to the hatch - type993 00:33:57 09/12/08 3rd. Looks like a CRX, and nobody wants that. (n/m) - Madshafter (SoCal) 04:30:13 09/12/08 Repost from 2 or 3 years ago. - Dave N 00:24:54 09/12/08 What a disgrace. Blow that thing up!! (n/m) - Slick_Myke 01:01:54 09/12/08 Notice the tear in the corner of the left headlamp (n/m) - EZEZ(NA>>TT) 02:42:47 09/12/08 to sad, i feel bad for it - onewheelf4 05:11:09 09/12/08 Re: Interesting looking 300zx - Willfastbackse 07:23:59 09/12/08 That is the incorrect response. - Z_Cherub 09:26:10 09/12/08 Re: That is the incorrect response. - Willfastbackse 16:05:28 09/12/08 Re: Re: That is the incorrect response. - Z_Cherub 16:08:23 09/12/08 Hideous (n/m) - opus300zx 07:55:39 09/12/08 Interesting, as in, ugly as hell. - LJZTT 08:08:10 09/12/08 I like the interior treatment, in spite of the color choice (n/m) - cherryz 09:00:53 09/12/08 Good thing it's an auto NA. (n/m) - Musashi Sword 09:26:41 09/12/08 Hater! ;) (n/m) - cherryz 09:28:21 09/12/08 :) I used to have an auto NA, hated it so much I made - Musashi Sword 09:38:28 09/12/08 Thus the reason why NAs arent "fast" per say - Drk93TT 10:57:53 09/12/08 awful (n/m) - Mike87T 09:41:38 09/12/08 Hmmm... - Drk93TT 10:48:58 09/12/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.